Answer:
Increase output
Explanation:
Increasing productivity of labor will result to greater MPP (Marginal Physical Product) per unit of labor (or worker). That means greater output.
<span>In a monopoly, prices are usually higher
because there's no competition,
whereas in a competitive market items which are not priced orderly may never sell
so correct option is A
hope it helps
</span>
Answer:
The question is not complete,find below complete questions:
If you purchased a $50 face value bond in early 2017 at the then current interest rate of .10 percent per year, how much would the bond be worth in 2027? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) c. In 2027, instead of cashing the bond in for its then current value, you decide to hold the bond until it doubles in face value in 2037. What annual rate of return will you earn over the last 10 years?
The bond is worth $50.50 in the year 2027
The annual rate of return is 7.07%
Explanation:
The future value of the bond is given by the below formula:
FV=PV*(1+r)^N
where PV is the present of the bond of $50
r is the rate of return of 0.10 percent=0.001
N is the duration of the bond investment of 10 years
FV=50*(1+0.001
)^10
FV=$50.50
However for the face of the bond to double i.e to $100, the rate of return can be computed thus:
r=(FV/PV)^(1/N)-1
where FV=$100 (double of $50)
FV=$50.50(current value in 2027)
N=10
r=($100/$50.50)^(1/10)-1
r=0.070707543
r=7.07%
Answer:
$3,735
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost that will be included in the numerator of that calculation is shown below:
= Beginning work in process + cost added during the period
= $350 + $3,385
= $3,735
Basically, we added the beginning work in process and the cost added during the period
The same amount is shown on the numerator side while calculating the cost per equivalent unit
Answer:
The burden of tax will be more on employees, tax reduction will be less for employees than employers.
Explanation:
Tax burden is more on buyers , if the demand is relatively more inelastic ; and tax burden is more on sellers, if the supply is relatively more inelastic.
If federal government reduces social security tax (from 12.4% to 6.2%) :
Since supply of labour is more inelastic, the burden of tax would be more on labour suppliers i.e employees. So ; a total tax reduction 6.2% is likely to reduce tax burden borne by labour demanders i.e employers, more than reduction in tax burden borne by labour suppliers i.e employees (as the labour supply is more inelastic).
