Answer:
Foot-in-the-door technique.
Explanation:
The foot-in-the-door technique is a compliance tactic that involves getting a person to agree to a modest request so that, in the long game, they agree to a large request. In this case, the approach in the example is a Foot-in-the-door technique given that they first made a small request (wear a button) so that, after some weeks of wearing that, they accept the large request (adopt a dog).
The distribution shows that 91% which is pretty much the very high-end were earning below $1,200 a year which means they were turning that much and we can infer that in the 18th there were people with a very poor background and technology want advance at that time and outcome of that would be people would be very poor and in this
It also showed that there were only 9% of people who are earning above $1,200 and this shows that not many people would have earned that but due to the background the amount of job opportunity the wages the seller which which all contribute and in this scenario
There are four option but the correct answer would be A as it also shows that not many people that much then having a poor background is a very good explanation to put this through. you you also tells that only a minority and above $1,200
So the correct answer is A
Field trials assessing clinician agreement when using the new dsm-5 categories indicate that diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder fared POORLY <span> and diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder fared WELL.
Dsm-5 consist several guidelines to aid psychological disorderss by changing the way OTHER PEOPLE behave to the patient.
These guidelines work really well with autistic patient, but anxiety disorder in general caused by patient's personal psychological struggle and only cure that the patient could have is only if she/he could change the way they see everything around them.</span>
<span>The reliability procedure that involves correlation of partial scores from one administration of one test is: Split half
Partial scores measure the degree of association between two variable. Since it came from two different variables, the reliability of this procedure is also split into two.</span>
