Answer:The increase in the supply of crops had decreased price by a greater percentage than the percentage increase in the quantity of sales.
Explanation:
An increase in supply leads to a fall in price due to large volume of goods supply compare to non increasing demand and when the rate of fall is greater than sales this will not lead to a rise in revenue despite the increase in effective supply to the market.
Answer: ethical dilemma
Explanation: In simple words, ethical dilemma refers to a condition in which an individual in authority have to make a choice of accepting one alternative over other in which none of the alternative is fully acceptable from the point of ethics.
In other words, it can be defined as a situation in which two principles of ethical psychology conflicts with each other. In these conditions, authority making the decision can never be fully ethical and have to give priority to one of the principles involved.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts ethical dilemma.
Answer: a. $120,000
b. $6,000
c. Yes
Explanation:
a. It is said that the collection centres would help reduce the collection time by 2 days and that every day $60,000 comes in.
If the proposal will reduce the amount of time taken to collect by 2 days then that means that the amount freed up is the amount that they would have collected in two days had it not been for the system.
That amount would be,
= $60,000 * 2
= $120,000
b. If they used this free up cash to pay off a debt that was accumulating 5% per year then the 5% will be saved.
The amount saved therefore is,
= 120,000 * 5%
= $6,000
By retiring a $120,000 that was accruing $6,000 a year, the proposal has enabled that $6,000 to be saved instead.
c. The cost of implementing this proposal is $5,200 per year and yet the savings it gives in interest is $6,000.
As the savings are higher than the cost, the number definitely suggest that the project should be implemented because it is more beneficial than it costs.
Answer:
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
1-year rate = 8%
2-year rate = 9%
3-year rate = 10%
Computation:
According to Pure Expectations Hypothesis,
(1 + 3-year rate)³ = (1 + 2-year rate)² (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1.10)³ = (1 + 1.09)²(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
1.331 = 1.1881 (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now) = 1.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 0.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
This scenario best illustrate Backward vertical integration
Explanation:
Backward integration is a vertical integration that extends the role of a organization to perform roles traditionally performed by firms in the supply chain.
In other terms, backward integration is where an enterprise imports another company providing the necessary goods or services for production.
For examples, an company might purchase the product or raw materials manufacturer. Businesses often complete retrograde incorporation of these other businesses or combine of them. However, they may set up their own divisions to perform this mission.
