Question

George offers to sell his car to Suzy for $10,000 on the coming Sunday, to which Suzy agrees. They write down the details on a paper. On the decided day, Suzy pays the cash to George, but he refuses to sell the car to her saying that his friend Marty has offered to pay $30,000 for the same car. On the basis of which doctrine can Suzy sue George?
a. Quasi-contract
b. Implied contract
c. Partially executed contract
d. Both (a) and (b).
e. Promissory estoppel

Answer 1

Answer:

Promissory estoppel

Explanation:

Promissory estoppel means that in legal tenet that a promise or pledge can be enforced by law, actually if formulated without legal consideration, if the George now the (promisor) has made a pledge to a Susy the (promises) who then depends on that promise for a subsequent detriment. So what Promissory estoppel is expected to do is to stop the (George) promisor from insisting that an underlying promise should not be legally authorized or implemented. So Susy can sue George on the basis of promissory estoppel and get a reward for George's disappointment