No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Answer:the us provided generous terms to Hawaiian sugar growers it occurred in 1890 when congress approved the McKinley tariff.
Explanatio
Answer:
Harriet Tubman's real name is Araminta Ross. She was born on March 1822.
Explanation:
Colonists felt the increased taxes in the 1760s and 1770s violated the English Bill of Rights. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third or the second last option. The English Bill of Rights was passed by the British Parliament on 16th of December in the year 1689.
Hello.
Agriculture changed daily life by having good jobs and stable homes. People no longer had to move from place to place.
People developed their own cultures.
People could spend time on activities
other than inding food.
People began to settle down in villages.
Have a nice day
