Answer:
b. FBX is a dominant allele.
Explanation:
If Darren's father has the gene for FBX and Darren's mother does not have this gene, but Darem has the disease, it means that the disease is encoded by a dominant allele.
We can draw that conclusion, because as we have seen, the alleles that Darren received from his mother and father responsible for bone development are different, so one is dominant and the other is recessive. Recessive genes are only expressed and homozygous, that is, Darren would only express the gene for bone development if both his father and mother donated recessive alleles.
On the other hand, dominant genes are expressed, even in the presence of a recessive gene. Therefore, we can say that the gene that Darren received from his father is dominant and was expressed even in the presence of the recessive gene, which Darren received from his mother.
It is true that theft of large amounts of money or personal belongings are also on the rise even with the relationship with municipal police station and the community.
<h3>What is the reason why crime can not be completely eliminated?</h3>
It should be noted that this question doe not provide full information, i am giving the overview about the described crime.
Crime is part of any large society irrespective how tight the security system , so far there is unemployment as well as poor state of living in a country , there will also be a recorded crime rate.
This is the case described in the question, even there are municipal police, people still commit crime.
Learn more about crime on:
brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Answer:
Talmadge argued FDR's New Deal programs were infringing on the rights of the states
Explanation:<em> A staunch Georgian Democrat, he believed in white superiority and the rules of the Jim Crow south. Programs like the WPA and the CCC allowed for black workers and in the South this was unacceptable and refuted their current social structure. Talmadge believed that the states should have the right to choose the workers for the programs implemented in their states. </em>
<em />
Answer:
The Middle Colonies were more diverse than colonies in New England and the South. Most of the early settlers depended on the fur trade and on farming for economic survival. The most populous of the Middle colonies was Pennsylvania, other colonies were settled rather haphazardly over the course of the 17th century. Settlers usually organized themselves in small farms spread throughout the colony with a few cities added to the mix.
- The Middle Colonies were not as cohesive as the New England colonies because colonists in this region were not united by single religion or code of beliefs.
- Area dominated by larger farms than N.E., smaller than the S.; still there is an emphasis on subsistence rather than cash crops. Settlement patterns generally revolve around single family farms (around 50 -150 acres). Again you see the predominance of servant (as opposed to slave labor) in the 17th century. [A notable exception is in New York where you see a large number of African Americans in the colony, especially in New York city where blacks are employed in commercial settings and as dockworkers.]
- The Middle Colonies were settled by different nationalities so there is greater emphasis on religious toleration and cultural diversity. This is especially true in the colony of New York.
I hope it helps.
They travel a bit and I am a good person to have my friends in apple and they just
