1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
3 years ago
15

Can you guess how the world would be with Anarchy ?

History
2 answers:
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
7 0
It depends. The true definition, with is roughly law without force, then it wouldn't be too bad. Sounds like it would just be a non corrupt world. However, modern day groups like ANTIFA, it would suck. Things have been blown out of proportion honestly to the point where anarchy, or "anti-fascism", almost looks like fascism.
xz_007 [3.2K]3 years ago
7 0

I think you confuse anarchy with a version of the so called Hobbesian nightmare. Anarchy simply means "no ruler". It does not mean "no rules".

......Many anarchists, like Anselme Bellegarrigue, have complained that "vulgar error has taken 'anarchy' to be synonymous with civil war
Under anarchy, creation (natural law purists would say discovery) and enforcement of the rules or social norms are decentralised rather than monopolised by a single institution currently called "government" or "the state". Anarchy means that no institution is exempt from the rules.
You might be interested in
How are Americans afraid of the future in the Americans
Karolina [17]

Answer: America is like that my freind is cheering for the irans in ww3 so yeah i got your idea

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP<br><br> which of the following best describes the meaning of the political cartoon?
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

hi

4 0
3 years ago
How did Clinton contribute to the stability in the Middle East during his administration?
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Ehud Barak and Yasir Arafat.

6 0
3 years ago
Bronze is a metal made of 40% copper and 60% tin
Mila [183]
Wrong subject my friend
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Atlanta Campaign:
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

The Atlanta Campaign was a campaign undertaken by Union Major General William T. Sherman. In the campaign, series of war took place between the Union army and Confederate army in 1864.

The purpose of Sherman through the Atlanta Campaign was to destroy the enemy army and capture Atlanta. Though Sherman was unsuccessful in destroying the army, he was able to bring Atlanta under Union's subjection.

With the thought in mind that Confederate may not again capture Atlanta, he destroyed the city before embarking on his famous 'March to the Sea.'

So, the correct answer is option B, that Sherman took Atlanta under Union's control and destroyed it.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Before the civil rights act of 1964, the slave codes or the black codes:
    5·1 answer
  • Eleanor roosevelt became a strong political asset to franklin roosevelt by advocating on behalf of
    9·1 answer
  • What was the stamp act and what were the colonists’ reactions?
    13·2 answers
  • A person who move from a place is called a
    15·1 answer
  • Did texas economy improved after the end of world war 1?
    5·1 answer
  • The populists wanted government solution to __ problems.
    13·2 answers
  • The “roar” of the Roaring Twenties most likely refers to ________.
    7·1 answer
  • What does "we can't take care of our own" mean? Explain your answer. *
    12·1 answer
  • As the Roman Empire expanded, Roman art developed by
    5·1 answer
  • The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason teaches all mankind, that being all eq
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!