Answer:
It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.
It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise, It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).
Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.
At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.
<span>
The Haitian Revolution was different from others in Latin America in
that L'Ouverture and others led a slave revolt that kicked the
French off the Island.
Latin American revolutions were started by creoles-- whites who were
born in the colonies. They didn't incite the slaves against the spanish </span>
Answer:
Think about what Only you can do by yourself, think about the good things in life
I capitalized the answers in the sentences:
The INDIAN Ocean separates Africa from Australia. The continent of NORTH AMERICA is east of Asia across the Pacific Ocean. The equator divides the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.
Hope I was able to help! :)
In this case, one has to check on some of the issues which had been addressed first by Hoover and later relate them and see how they could be addressed by Coolidge and Harding and the techniques used by Harding also realized hence the way to address this case . For instance, Hoover had tackled issues based on economic and social development, therefore, these are similar issues to be related to the resolving powers of Harding and Coolidge. For instance, Coolidge and Harding talked much and had a lot of approaches to solving issues, for instance they used policy approach techniques to solve such issues, for instance the economic policy that led to economic growth, growth in the constitutional government among other things, hence the way to go about this case. Explanation: In this regard, the achievements of Coolidge and Harding have been realized and therefore there is need address the issue which Hoover dealt with and refer them to how Coolidge and Harding could have dealt with them, hence the reason as to why using the policy approach to solving issues has been proposed in this case.