Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
for Plato the correct answer is D. overtime (wages) paid to workers :)
Answers and explanations:
1) A modification problem takes places when creating a database two different type of information is entered in the same chart row generating inaccuracy. The only form to solve this issue is creating a new row so each piece of information will be stored in one row particularly.
2) There are three (3) types of modification problems: the deletion problem (<em>the single row containing information from different themes can be deleted losing data</em>), the update problem (<em>new information entered could lead to more inconsistency</em>), and the insertion problem (<em>similar to deletion, a new row can be inserted instead of the row causing problem but information will be missing</em>).
An employee at Falcon Security is studying an analyst of data regarding the occurrence of problems and failures with its drones camera. Based on the analysis, the employee may schedule maintenance on the equipment Falcon Security is using the analysis to decision making.
Answer: False
Explanation:
A dissenting opinion refers to an opinion in a legal case that's written by the judge(s) who disagree with the court's majority opinion that gives rise to its judgment.
It should be noted that a justice who agrees with the outcome of a case but doesn't agree with the reason that was proffered by other justices can issue a concurring opinion and not a dissenting opinion.
Therefore, the correct option is False.
