All categories

2 years ago

Why was waging war in Vietnam difficult for US soldiers?

1 answer:

7 0

Cultural shock, Cold War rules of engagement, lack of recognition, Racial divide and social class issues, constant changing of personnel, high casualties, morale issues and a determined enemy.

Hope This Helps! Have A Nice Day!!

You might be interested in

#1.

allsm [11]

I can answer number 7, the aryans were the “race” of people who inhabited Europe. Hitler described them as the perfect race when having blonde hair and blue eyes.

3 0

2 years ago

During the mid 1960s

vlada-n [284]

Answer:

? do you have more context

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Which of the following did not encourage the latin american revolutionaries

Tanya [424]

Victories in the French and Indian war

8 0

2 years ago

How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?

Tems11 [23]

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Shoppersmart sells backpacks for $0.57 less than Multi-mart. If p represents the price for backpacks at Shoppersmart, what is p?

Likurg_2 [28]

Question:

Shoppers mart sells backpacks for $0.57 less than Multi-mart. If p represents the price for backpacks at Shoppers mart, what is p?

The price of multi mart is $ 15.35

A. $15.92

B. $14.86

C. $14.78

D. $13.72

Answer:

Option C

Price of backpacks at Shoppers mart "p" is $ 14.78

Solution:

Let "p" be the price of backpack at shoppers mart

Price of back pack at multi mart is $ 15.35

Given that Shoppers mart sells backpacks for $0.57 less than Multi-mart

Therefore, we frame a equation as:

Price of backpack at shoppers mart = price of back pack at multi mart - 0.57

p = price of back pack at multi mart - 0.57

Substitute, price of back pack at multi mart = $ 15.35

Therefore,

p = 15.35 - 0.57

p = 14.78

Thus price of backpacks at Shoppers mart is $ 14.78

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers