The answer that best describes the discussion is option (a)i.e, It is an informal discussion because the people could participate without preparing in advance.
<h3>What is Discussion?</h3>
Discussion is described as speaking or writing about something, particularly to address a challenge or answer a query. When two or more individuals have opposing views and decide to sit down and debate them, that is an example of a discussion.
Formal Discussion:
- often take the form of a focus group or guided discussion (discussions are based on a set of questions produced before the group session).
- can assist in identifying key problems and generating solutions
- can serve as a means of testing assumptions
- last one to two hours
An informal discussion should be just that—informal. An informal discussion has no predetermined rules or structure and is meant to be an open and honest exchange of information between the decision-maker and the person who was disqualified from consideration.
Therefore, The answer that best describes the discussion is option (a).
To know more about the discussion refer to: https://brainly.ph/question/9850207
#SPJ10
I find the premise to be ridiculous, and the reality of success limited to a tiny handful of people. Simple facts of fire and wild areas make it highly unlikely to succeed. Let's use retiring at 40 as an example. To make the income required almost certainly requires college, so that leaves about 17–18 years of working. If you average $60,000 for the first eight years, and $100,000 for the next ten years, you earned a total of $1.48 million. By the way, those earnings are above the norm. Taxes will take you down to $1 million. That leaves about $50,000 per year net income average. Basic decent cost of living is $3,000 per month minimum. Here's where the FIRE gurus start to get crazy. Live in your parents basement! Drive a $500 car! Eat beans and rice! Think about QUALITY OF LIFE. Is working really that horrible that you want to live like a bum for two decades to avoid it? So you have about $14,000 a year to save. Lets say life doesn't get in your way - things like kids, a wife who doesn't share your desire to do nothing, car breaking down, etc. You will save about $260,000 much of it saved after age thirty. As a millennial, you hold the mistaken impression that the stock market is a one-way, no lose proposition. Quora today is brimming with questions about the “crash" where stocks have fallen 13%. I've got news for you, you ain't seen nothing yet. In my lifetime I have seen a half dozen markets where the danger of losing half your money was real. For FIRE to work you have to aggressively grow $260k into some decent amount and then pray that the next 30–40 years doesn't have any economic calamities. And it will have calamities, you can count on that. But let's say you get your $260,000 up to $400,000 by age 40. Using 5% withdrawal rate, that is $20,000 per year. I don't see a life worth living on $20k per year. So you decide to supplement your income, maybe you are good with your hands so you pick up some carpentry work. Or work in starting a blog. Yes, WORK. You are WORKING. I don't care if you are on a beach in Maui or commuting to an office in Chicago - if you are trading your time for money you are NOT retired, you are working.
Answer:
Agree about the issue or be against it and discuss.
Explanation:
When writing down an argumentative writing, you may write down as many current issues that you can think of, even if you have not yet formed strong opinions about them. Just make sure that they are issues--matters open to discussion and debate. Arguments are not one-sided, as much as we might sometimes wish they were. If they were only made up of one side, it would be so much easier to win. But such is life, and facing different perspectives from your own is a part of an argument; even if you feel other perspectives are harmful and perpetuate hateful ideals that you cannot even try to understand on a personal level.
You can hope that everyone will come to see things the way you do, but until then, give them a hard time by proving that yo have got the knowledge to back yourself up and rid them of any leverage they might have been prepared to place on your assumed ignorance.
This question is about "Grendel" by John Gardner.
Answer and Explanation:
Grendel feels very lonely and anguished because he cannot maintain social relationships with any living being, as he is the only one of his kind. He fully wishes to find a company, someone with whom he can talk and share experiences, however, he only has contact with his mother and they are unable to communicate. Grendel, manages to understand human beings and to be touched by his creations, but humans are afraid of him and attack him causing him to retaliate violently.
This increases the suffering and loneliness of Grendel, who was cursed in addition to not being hurt and being immortal, which makes him sad to have to live like this forever. However, when he fights with Beowulf he is surprised to be hit to the death and is happy and grateful that all his loneliness will end now that he can finally die.
He commits innumerable crimes throughout the novel, ranging from writing “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER” in his diary
