From the narration, we can conclude that Rainsford is adventurous and knowledgeable about the outdoors.
<h3>Why is this conclusion possible?</h3>
- Because Rainsford can get a sense of the time by looking at the position of the sun.
- Because he proves to be a connoisseur of the environment.
- Because when he sees that he is in the environment, he is happy.
Rainsford is a hunter and spends a lot of time in the wild, going on adventures and exploring open areas. For this reason, he was happy to realize that he was in a natural environment because he knew how these environments work and could act more safely.
Learn more about Rainsford:
brainly.com/question/2463154
#SPJ1
<u>The correct answer is: It demonstrates that Nora is considering leaving her children.</u> Nora reveals to the nurse that she fears that her children will forget her if she leaves definitively. Nora believes that her secret will be revealed and she will be expelled from her home, her family and society. Nora did not have to worry about taking care of the children because she had the help of the nurse and more servants.
To Be or not to be, that s the question. He is uncertain whether life is worth living. Hamlet's perception of himself has a huge influence on how he perceives life, and he sees himself as different to other noble men in his environment.
→It wouldn't be A (Queen-) because of the dash.
→It wouldn't be B (There is no error in this sentence) because there's an error.
→It wouldn't be D (Is:) because you only use ":" when you're giving multiple things together.
→The answer is C (Queen;) because it's joining the sentences together. It's like having a comma in the sentence after "Queen."
Answer:
From what I read, I think you should. You should also do it if it makes you happy :)
