Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
Answer for the above question is <u>option C</u>
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
<u>Option C -</u> It's a quadrilateral but not a rhombus . As we know rhombus has congruent sides while its two angle can't be measured 120 degrees but in option C it seems two vertically opposite angles of to be 120 degrees. In rhombus opposite angles are same while adjacent angles are supplementary. All options except C are the rhombus of congruent sides.
Width: x
Length: 3x
Perimeter=x+x+3x+3x=8x
8x=400
x=50
Dimension is 150×50 feet (length × width)
Answer:
B. all real numbers
Step-by-step explanation:
hope that helps
