Answer:
for me personally, i find it more fun and easier to do a little bit of both when writing a paper. why? because it both "fights" against what is wrong with whatever your topic may be while simultaneously explaining a better way to see it.
Explanation:
hope this helps :) have a nice day !!
The change in women's roles was caused by their affection/what they did during the war. The decision of women's right to vote was made.
Hi Daisy! I have to admit, even as a History major, this question slightly puzzled me at first, as George Rogers Clark occupied a different role in my mind. But remember that Washington is best known as a general in the Revolutionary War, and cut of the 'Marquis de' and just say 'Lafayette,' who was a great French ally in the Revolutionary War. Clark is not well known, but also commanded military engagements in the far northern colonies during the war. So the correct answer is D.
Hope that helps!
Answer:The US Supreme Court invalidated a New York State statute forbidding bakers from working more than 10 hours per day, or 60 hours per week. The 5-4 divided Court held the law was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause because it restricted workers' liberty right to freely contract with their employers. Lochner represents an early use of Substantive Due Process purported to protect workers' rights, but generally favored industry over labor.
Explanation:The State of New York passed labor laws in 1897 that, among other things, restricted the ability of bakeries to force employees to work more than 10 hours per day, or 60 hours per week, on the grounds that longer work hours had a negative affect on employees' health.
Lochner owned a bakery and had been convicted on two separate occasions of violating the statute after being indicted for "wrongfully and unlawfully [requiring and permitting] an employee working for him in his biscuit, bread and cake bakery and confectionery establishment, at the city of Utica, in this county, to work more than sixty hours in one week." He was subsequently convicted and fined $50 for the second offense, and ordered confined to jail until the penalty was paid.