The three on the left are first person and the three on the right are second-
A graph that helps shows relationships between facts and concepts.
Based on the question above, the system can be described as State Public Project.
<h3>State Public Project</h3>
- This is a project organised by the government of the Los Angeles in achieving a unified system of education. it encompasses giving electronic gadgets to students and having same uniform among others
<h3>The fall-outs</h3>
Failure to gain stakeholder support, missing requirements, quality related issues, failure to fully recognize the transformational shift in learning.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the project failed as a result of the lack of support.
Learn more about Los Angeles here: brainly.com/question/5955527
A: He's the cook, and the ringleader,too.
Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
