Which choice offers the most logical conclusion about literacy rates in Kenya and Sudan?

1 answer:

6 0

Here is the full excerpt for this question
<span>From 2003 to 2008, literacy rates in Sudan averaged 85% for male students and 71% for female students. In Kenya, the literacy rate for males was 80% and 81% for females.
-- UNICEF, United Nations Population Division and United Nations Statistics Division.
Which choice offers the most logical conclusion about literacy rates in Kenya and Sudan?
A)The Sudanese educational system has been more successful in educating the youth of the nation.
B)Literacy rates in Kenya are lower due to the nation's on-going civil wars and ethnic conflicts.
C)Female students in Kenya have greater access to educational opportunities than female students in Sudan.
D)Female students in Sudan have greater access to educational opportunities than female students in Kenya.

I believe the answer is </span>C)Female students in Kenya have greater access to educational opportunities than female students in Sudan.

From the data above, we could see that the female literacy rate in kenya is about 10% higher compared to student. This indicates that more families in kenya actually allowed their female children to get education that would benefit their future

You might be interested in

Edgar and Jayne are a couple in their 40s. They are busy raising a family of three children. They also spend considerable time e

Rzqust [24]

I'd say D) Sandwich Generation
I might be wrong, but wanted to give it a shot

~ Good luck!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. At times, priori

nalin [4]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.

However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.

As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.

Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.

It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.

Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.

3 0

3 years ago

How many american sailors were impressed? please help this is due in 2 mins

docker41 [41]

Answer: Over 15,000 people

Explanation: Between the times of 1793-1812 over 15,000 US Sailors were impressed.

7 0

3 years ago

The Texas Insurance Commissioner has the powers and duties vested in the Department by which of the following?

Mkey [24]

Answer:

a. The Texas insurance code.