Answer:
Whites used the policy of apartheid to hold on to their power, wealth, and control.
Whites continued to control South Africa even after South Africa gained its independence.
Explanation:
The whites in South Africa use apartheid laws as a tool for domination over the majority who were Blacks.
The apartheid laws were discriminating and bias in nature, they gave a total say to the whites in South Africa while they oppressed the blacks.
The domination of up to 80 percent of the land in South Africa by whites who were the minority compared to blacks who were the majority clear gives evidence that the apartheid rules were working for the welfare of the white South Africans.
After independence, the whites in south Africa had the Apartheid rule in place to guard their intrests, this made the whites have authority over the black population hence, the whites continues to controll South Africa.
Answer: In this example, the ice cream is the REWARD for Positive REINFORCEMENT.
Explanation: In Psychology, reinforcement can be defined as the process whereby a behavior with desirable consequences comes to be repeated. Reinforcement is applied to promote or encourage a behavior in the future.
<span>a state of transcendence and well-being.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000. Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003. Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005.
Answer:
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
D) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
This would be the best way to explain what this conclusion means. The hypothesis states that more than 21% of the population suffers from professional problems due to extreme shyness. Moreover, the null hypothesis states that there is no meaningful relationship between two measured phenomena. If we "fail to reject" the hypothesis, this means that we do not have evidence that shows that the hypothesis is not true. Therefore, we can claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
