Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
A six sigma level has a lower and upper specification limits between
and
. It means that the probability of finding no defects in a process is, considering 12 significant figures, for values symmetrically covered for standard deviations from the mean of a normal distribution:
![\\ p = F(\mu + 6\sigma) - F(\mu - 6\sigma) = 0.999999998027](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5C%5C%20p%20%3D%20F%28%5Cmu%20%2B%206%5Csigma%29%20-%20F%28%5Cmu%20-%206%5Csigma%29%20%3D%200.999999998027%20)
For those with defects <em>operating at a 6 sigma level, </em>the probability is:
![\\ 1 - p = 1 - 0.999999998027 = 0.000000001973](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5C%5C%201%20-%20p%20%3D%201%20-%200.999999998027%20%3D%200.000000001973%20)
Similarly, for finding <em>no defects</em> in a 5 sigma level, we have:
.
The probability of defects is:
![\\ 1 - p = 1 - 0.999999426697 = 0.000000573303](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5C%5C%201%20-%20p%20%3D%201%20-%200.999999426697%20%3D%200.000000573303%20)
Well, the defects present in a six sigma level and a five sigma level are, respectively:
Then, comparing both fractions, we can confirm that a <em>6 sigma level is markedly different when it comes to the number of defects present:</em>
[1]
[2]
Comparing [1] and [2], a six sigma process has <em>2 defects per billion</em> opportunities, whereas a five sigma process has <em>600 defects per billion</em> opportunities.
Answer:
ok
Step-by-step explanation:
ok
The answer is 2.8. or around there