<em>Answer:</em> Destiny chose to take art instead of music because she enjoyed art more.
I love running outside in the rain. This is an example of a first-person point of view (using pronoun “I”). The narrator is talking about what he himself likes.
Destiny chose to take art instead of music because she enjoyed art more. This is an example of third-person <em>objective</em> point of view. The third-person is demonstrated by the use of “he/she,” while the objectivity is shown because the narrator does not know any more information than what could be guessed by everyone in the story.
Jake hastily made the decision to leave his umbrella by the door instead of taking it with him. This would prove a poor choice. This is an example of a third-person <em>subjective</em> point of view. The character is a narrator who is not only describing the events, but has information that no character would know. The narrator could know about the character’s feelings, future plans, concerns, even when the character hasn’t mentioned them out loud. In this case, the narrator has information about the future consequences of not taking the umbrella.
You should always listen to your mother's advice. This is a second-person point of view (using pronoun “you”).
The answers are given here with short explanations :
Explanation:
Question 1:
<u>Erika considered his class good preparation for college.</u>
While the first sentence reveals she does not dislike him, this is a clear indication of her respect for him.
Question 2:
<u>Her B in Mr. Kelp's class was her lowest letter grade overall.</u>
<u />
The lines before this make it clear that she is brilliant so this shows that all other grades are As.
Question 3:
<u>She wants Erika to steal a copy of the test from the teacher.</u>
She indirectly wants Erika to do it.
Question 4 :
<u>They wanted Erika to steal the answers for them instead.</u>
<u />
They knew they could coerce her to steal the papers for them so they did not want to study.
Question 5:
<u>Her teammates gave three explicit reasons.</u>
They reasoned that they cannot study for the test and that they may loose the championship and lastly that a team player puts the team first.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>"Excerpt from Marine Mammals in Captivity"</em> by The Humane Society of the United States claims that marine animals such as Whales are naturally suitable for the open sea, and thus should not be confined.
The author provided evidence from findings that show that been kept in captivity is <em>"the probable cause of dorsal fin collapse."</em>
While in <em>"Excerpt from What Zoo Critics Don
’t Understand
" </em>by Jack Hanna, the author claims that leaving animals in confinement (like a zoo) may be considered the safest place for them instead of the sending into the wild.
To support his claims, he stated some of the challenges animals may face if exposed to the wild, such as,<em> </em><em>"habitat loss, poaching, severe weather, and war."</em>
In all, we <u>can conclude that the second author (Jack Hanna) seems to be more convincing based on the evidence he provided which can be applied to several wild animals.</u>
An intriguing plot, detailed characters, and an interesting rising action.
