The correct answer is turning point for the way the laws of colonial Virginia distinguished people of different races
In 1676, one hundred years before the declaration of independence, the state of Virginia was the scene of the so-called Bacon Rebellion, in which landowners, slaves and servants came together, and which can only be stifled with the dispatch of English troops. It began as a product of the demand of the wealthy landowner Nathaniel Bacon, whose properties were located in the border area, for a more effective war policy against "the Indian". This demand to local authorities extended to the denunciation of an unfair tax policy, the arbitrary distribution of public offices and the lack of protection for farmers against the indigenous threat, in “a mixture of populist resentment against the rich and border hatred against the Indians ”. (Apart from the huge historical-social distances, we could say that it is similar to a Trump that today rages against the political and economic establishment while agitating a strongly xenophobic and anti-immigrant program).
The significance of this rebellion was that it brought together a heterogeneous social spectrum, attracting the dissatisfaction of slaves and servants against their living conditions, showing a potentially dangerous social union. In addition to the problem of indigenous hostility and the danger of slave revolts, the colonial elite had to do with the class anger of the poor whites - the servants, the tenants, the urban poor, the landless, the taxpayers, soldiers and sailors. In fact, after the Bacon Rebellion in 1760, "eighteen new attempts were made to overthrow the colonial governments and eight black revolts in South Carolina and New York." (The Other History of the United States). In this context, racism was the preferred ideological artifact used by the dominant classes to prevent the development of these social ties. But under the strong fiscal pressure that ensued the wars waged by England, which increased poverty in the lower strata and affected sectors of the local elites, they began to defend nationalist ideals as a way to monopolize the extraction of resources while unleashing potential rebellions. depending on national unity.
Answer:
Men become enemies because they both desire the same thing which cannot be shared. Men would compete for it and become enemies.
Explanation:
False the treaty of Versailled places to the blame for World War I on Germany because Germany was the one who started of war war one
Answer:
Labor
Explanation:
A. Well labor needed to be changed, in the New World (colonial times) labor wasn't in favor for the colonists but, slaves and indentured servants were. Mostly slaves had it bad, indentured servants were there to work for you for a couple of years to pay of their debt and a free ride to the new world. America only wanted a way to keep people as their workers to build, cook, and farm for them. So they came up with slaves. Slaves were African people who were forced to work for their owners till they die.
B. To make "changes" Britain kept coming up with acts to set up the colonists.
C. Although their making only started wars and fights. So they weren't that successful.
D. Today we pay people to do their work but the people who did the work would not be kept. They'd still have their rights as humans.
(Hopefully this helped!!! <3 )
The Shah was very unpopular with many Iranians. Iran is a very traditional Muslim nation, and many of the Iranian people were displeased with the changes the Shah imposed upon them. Many people close to the Shah were corrupt. Anyone who disagreed with the Shah was forced to leave the nation or face SAVAK, the Shah’s brutal secret police
