"The promise of an easy life" was not a reason that people moved west in the late 1800s, since in fact many people knew that this new life would be quite dangerous and difficult.
The size of personal and committee staff in Congress exploded in the 1970s and 1980s. because Insufficient staffing had turn out to be an pressing grievance amongst paid staff.
The distinction in length among the two chambers method that more paintings is executed at the floor in the Senate and greater paintings is finished in committees in the house. applies only when the Congress isn't in session.
Insufficient staffing had turn out to be an pressing grievance amongst paid staff. Lawmakers couldn't be specialists on all the troubles that got here earlier than their committees or that they had to vote congress.inadequate staffing had become an urgent complaint amongst paid group of workers. Lawmakers could not be experts on all of the problems that came before their committees or that they had to vote in on congress.
Committee leaders advantage multiplied independence and influence even as formal birthday celebration management structures are created; celebration leaders are denied committee.
Learn more about congress here:-brainly.com/question/1578160
#SPJ4
Clarence Darrow is going to be the right answer
The answer would be C. Lincoln did not live to see the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment passed.
Answer:
If I were a European leader during the Age of Imperialism, I would attempt to approach my goal of expanding my empire through diplomacy. Much like the control the United States achieved over China through the Open Door Policy, I would try to secure a strong economic influence in the country/territory and create international agreements (which made other countries feel like they had huge influence) to secure my own interests there. Then, I would find a resource that said country/territory could not live without and become the sole provider of said resource. Then, the country would have no choice but to depend on my European power (wah haha). Basically, I would manipulate the country/territory I want into needing my power while making other international powers think that they have a good deal while in reality I have the economic spoils and they have only a little. By using diplomacy rather than force or "international bullying," I have not created much of a conflict. Instead, everyone is blissfully ignorant of the fact that my country has completely taken over. Therefore, this is the perfect solution with definitely no disadvantages.
*Please note that a good bit of this answer was quite sarcastic, but I think you get the gist. :))
