In Simons and Chabris’s (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team’s basketball passes while ignoring the black team’s basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur
C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur
D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data
Answer:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.
This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.
The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D.
Answer:a. shows low resistance to extinction; shows high resistance to extinction
Explanation:
According to psychology, extinction occurs when a conditioned response is slowly eliminated or weakned which over time will result to that behavior being extinct. This means a conditioned behavior is completely eliminated
An example is when you whistle to a dog all the time to come and get food and the dog starts to drool all time at the thought of whistling associated with food , if you gradually start to whistle without carrying the food with you the dog will stop salivating or drooling.
In classical conditioning, when a conditioned stimulus is provided without an unconditioned stimulus the conditioned response eventually get extinct.
Jeremy is not resistant towards getting rid of the gambling behaviour because when he start gambling and is no longer getting paid off he immediately stops so when an unconditioned stimulus is taken away , he stops gambling and if this keeps happening gradually his behavior of gambling will be extinct.
Jessica on the other side continues even when the unconditioned stimulus (being paid off )is taken away she still continues to gamble so she is resistance towards stoping her gambling behavior.
Answer:
Who do you have the most conflict with right now? Your answer to this question probably depends on the various contexts in your life. If you still live at home with a parent or parents, you may have daily conflicts with your family as you try to balance your autonomy, or desire for independence, with the practicalities of living under your family’s roof. If you’ve recently moved away to go to college, you may be negotiating roommate conflicts as you adjust to living with someone you may not know at all. You probably also have experiences managing conflict in romantic relationships and in the workplace. So think back and ask yourself, “How well do I handle conflict?” As with all areas of communication, we can improve if we have the background knowledge to identify relevant communication phenomena and the motivation to reflect on and enhance our communication skills.
Explanation:
Answer:
Fraud in the inducement
Explanation:
Fraud in the inducement happens when a party goes into an agreement knowing that the agreement is a contract as well as understanding its purpose but makes the agreement based on false information received. Fraud in the inducement is not legal. Any fraud in the inducement Contract is voided, and this causes dismissal of contractual duties.
In this case Al relied on the information he got from Sam to sign the contract. The bird dog that was bought has not being able to perform the duties for which the buyer got it.
Answer:
Fred's immediate need for money
Explanation:
Crime is generally the function of human decision-making process. Potential offender do weighs the costs and benefits of an illegal act. That is the pros and cons.
Classical Criminology is a compilation of different theory of crime stating criminal behavior as an issue, consideration or matter of personal choice usually made after individual consider it costs and benefit, and that the criminal behavior shows the inherent the needs of the offender.
Offense-Specific Crime
Holds the theory or view that an offender tend to reacts in a selective manner or approach to the characteristics of a particular criminal act.
Offender-Specific Crime simply holds the notion or view that offenders weigh their skills, motives, needs, and fears before deciding to commit the criminal act.
Fred immediate need for money is still not a crime yet. It is what he does to answer that needs be it illegal makes it a crime.
