Answer:
Conditioned stimulus
Explanation:
In the classical conditioned, these terms such as condition stimulus, UCS, CS, NS, etc are being used to modify the behavior of a person, animal, etc. The conditioned stimulus is neutral before as a conditioned stimulus. Ivan Pavlov was the first psychologist who has been used classical conditioning in which a person used CS, UCS, UCR, and CR.
Thus here in the above statement, the person eats a hamburger. Before used it, it was a neutral stimulus but after using it, it becomes a conditioned stimulus.
Answer:
What is the questionФω∫
Explanation:
What is the question exactly?
Top to bottom
6, 4, 1, 5, 3, 2, 8, 7
According to "A transnational strategy is difficult to achieve because the multiple objectives involved are contradictory" the given statement is False.
<h3>Briefing:</h3>
Because of its competing objectives, a transnational strategy is challenging to implement. Even when successfully implemented, the transnational strategy frequently results in less performance than either the multi-domestic or global strategies.
<h3>What is a global strategy?</h3>
An international business structure in which a company's global business operations are coordinated through collaboration as well as the interdependence between its head office, operational divisions, and globally dispersed subsidiaries or retail outlets
<h3>What is the significance of a global strategy?</h3>
A transnational strategy will help businesses that want to expand internationally enter a local market more successfully and quickly build a customer base. This is largely due to the fact that local staff members should be more able to communicate with others in their culture than may be the case with outsiders.
To know more about transnational strategy visit:
brainly.com/question/28199118
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is:
A transnational strategy is difficult to achieve because the multiple objectives involved are contradictory. True or False.
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
Many people are very scared that a stronger governent would mean less rights for individuals. States might prefer to decide things like voting laws, drinking/driving ages, or recycling laws by themselves.
