I think reads should choose texts with dynamic characters that they find interesting.
The correct answer for this question is this one: "<span>Anthony suggests that since the plight of women is like that of formerly enslaved African American men, women are entitled to protection under the Fifteenth Amendment." That shows the argument that Anthony is making.
</span>
Based on the projected net incomes and cost of purchasing the equipment, the average accounting rate of return is 12.5%.
<h3>How can we find the average accounting rate of return?</h3>
This can be found as:
= Average cashflows / Average investment
Average cashflows are:
= (7,200 + 11,300 + 14,100 + 20,000) / 4
= $13,150
Average investment is:
= 210,000 / 2
= $105,000
The average accounting rate of return is:
= 13,150 / 105,000
= 12.5%
The new equipment should not be bought if the required AAR is 12% because it would be less than the AARR.
Find out more on Average accounting rate of return at brainly.com/question/18914899.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Paragraph rewritten with consistency: " In the story, "The Valiant Woman" by J. J. Powers, we find that in judging people we overlook most of the characteristics that draw us to him (them), but we do so without realizing it. You (we) can draw inaccurate conclusions about a person by misjudging their facial expressions, their physical stamina, and their obvious personality traits. When people (we) are blinded by false superiority, they (we) judge a person incorrectly because they (we) fail to see them as they really are."
Explanation:
To generate consistency in the above passage, you must keep the message linked to a single narrative, keeping pronouns fixed to something or someone. For this it is necessary that you when speaking with readers always use the pronouns "we", "us", while, when referring to the people being judged, always use the pronouns "they" and "them". In this way the passage will show consistency, as shown above.
The correct answer is:
a.
Run on
The given sentence is
an example of a run on sentence which is also known as a “fused sentence”. It has
two parts wherein either part can stand alone without the other. But instead of
being connected properly, they have been pieced together inaccurately and could
still be improved.
