Answer:
That form of government is socialism.
Explanation:
Socialism is based off the concept of total harmony, the people usually share a lot of benefits, which are often regulated by the government though. Sadly most socialist values are not reflected in their society as the usually end up flawed. Monarchies do not equally distribute power to the people. In free enterprise, private businesses compete for superiority and are not regulated strongly by the government. They don't share goods and services however, and do not relate to any system of power throughout the people. I hope this helps :)
The Lazzez- Faire Doctrine is a statement that restricted the Government's involvement with the Economy.
Country that contributed greatly to western civilization is Ancient Athens.
Explanation:
- Athenian democracy is the first known form of democratic political order in the history of mankind. It developed in the fifth century BC.
- Every free citizen of Athens had the right to attend a session of the assembly, to listen to the debate on all issues, from what to do with the financial surplus, to whether or not to go to war. No slaves or women participated in political life.
- About six thousand people attended the assembly at the time, and everyone was entitled to climb the booth and make known their position. It would then be voted by raising their hands.
- When it came to the courts, there were no lawyers or prosecutors. If a citizen wanted justice, he had to go to trial and go to a jury. But in the end, not everything was just and ideal. Unfortunately, there were also "dirty games".
- When extremely important voting took place, special tiles were used. Citizens would take a piece of clay and wrote the name of an Athenian who wanted to be expelled from the city for up to ten years
Class:History
Level: Middle school
Keywords: Athenian democracy, Assembly
Learn more on Athenian democracy on
brainly.com/question/4936536
brainly.com/question/1993231
brainly.com/question/1785844
#learnwithBrainly
Before embarking on the series of court cases that argued for his freedom, Scott’s life was the rootless existence typical of many slaves. Born around 1799 in Virginia, he moved with his owner Peter Blow to Alabama and eventually to St. Louis, where he was sold to U.S. Army Dr. John Emerson in the early 1830s.
Like many antebellum officers, Emerson was transferred from post to post through Western states and territories. During those journeys, Scott married a slave woman named Harriet Robinson in 1836. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott, by then the father of two children, likely hoped the doctor’s will would manumit him—and his family—but it did not. Scott then offered Emerson’s brother-in-law and executor, J.A. Sanford, $300 hoping to buy his own freedom. But the offer was turned down. Scott decided to take the matter to the courts.
By 1846, Scott was living in St. Louis in service to Emerson’s widow. He filed suit with the state of Missouri, claiming that since he had lived with Emerson in Illinois—where slavery was outlawed by the 1787 Northwest Ordinance—and Fort Snelling in Minnesota—where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in 1820—he was entitled to his freedom. In an interesting twist, the children of Peter Blow, Scott’s first owner, provided the slave family financial assistance.
Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
The Unit 731 experiments involved infecting prisoners, primarily Chinese prisoners of war and civilians, deliberately with infectious agents, and exposing prisoners to bombs designed to penetrate the skin with infectious particles.
Explanation:
I googled it
