This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
In the second half of the 19th century, humans used all of the following technological advances to modify and adapt to the physical environment except "the telephone," since although this technology was invented in 1876, it wasn't widely implemented for some time.
Answer:The Government are responsible for bringing new laws into force, once they has been passed by Parliament. ... Although Parliament is not responsible for implementing legislation, its committees can investigate how well an Act is being implemented by the Government and the effect that the new law is having.
Answer:
a) land grant
Explanation:
These grants were given to settlers of the Americas.
Four allied strategies on the European Front in World war II included :
A. Driving the axis powers from North Africa
B. The battle of Normandy
E.. The drive across France
F. closing in on Germany from the east and the west
Hope this helps
