In direct characterization character's personality is explicitly described. Indirect characterization on the other hand uses dialogue, actions and other non-explicitly descriptions. Fro the given sentences the following sentence is example of direct characterization:
The door opened and in came ridiculous Reginald, as dapper and debonair as ever.
It refers to "Supreme Judge" when talking about intentions, and ends with firm reliance "divide providence." The Independent states now have power because they're separated from England.
Based on the question above, Dickens did not consider the second man as a good listener.
<h3>Synopsis</h3>
From the text, he has clearly defined a good listener.
<h3 /><h3>
Good listener</h3>
- Knowing what to listen to, the good listener also knows what not to listen to; knowing the time to listen, he also knows the time to talk. When he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better talk.
<h3>Good talker</h3>
- I also agree with Dickens on who a good talker or listener should be. A good talker knows the maxims of communication and so does a listener.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is No. He would not consider him to be a good listener.
Learn more about Dickens here: brainly.com/question/25874822"
