1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seraphim [82]
3 years ago
11

Why did the classical civilizations seem to need radical social inequalities?

History
2 answers:
telo118 [61]3 years ago
7 0
Higher class needed to suppress lower class in order to keep them "at bay".
ohaa [14]3 years ago
3 0

The classical civilizations depended on an underclass of laborers (often in the form of slaves) to support the higher classes that were creating the "classical" advancements of civilization in government, philosophy, the arts, etc.

Philosophers in the classical era justified these social inequalities.  The Greek philosopher Plato proposed that the ideal state, described in his writing, <em>The Republic, </em>would have three classes of persons in it.  At the bottom level are the producers--farmers, craftsman, laborers--who make the basic things society needs.  At the top level are the guardians or rulers, whom Plato envisioned to be the wisest members of society, sort of philosopher-kings.  In between there would also be a class of auxiliaries, the spirited type of men who would serve as military protectors of the state.  Plato's model envisioned people fit into the class within society for which they were most naturally suited.  

Aristotle also (the next great classical era philosopher in Greece) believed that human beings were naturally predisposed to certain types of life.  He justified the institution of slavery by saying that some persons were just better suited by their nature to be commanded by other and be in subservient roles, for the overall good of society.

You might be interested in
What was the outcome of the American Indian movement?
sasho [114]

American Indian movement is the Native American organization which is formed for the welfare of the Native Americans. Many a times Native Americans were abused and benefits of the government were not provided to them.  

Explanation:

AIM, American Indian movement is the organization which works for safeguarding the interest of the Native Americans; it was started in Minneapolis in 1960. This organization was of great help to make Native Americans who acquired various grants of the governments but unfortunately many Americans had taken advantage of this opportunity.

AIM, had accomplished to gain equality to Native Americans. Due to this organization, many Native Americans have been enjoying better living conditions and the quality of living would be high due on job training provided to them and quality educational system is extended to them.

3 0
3 years ago
What goals did President Jefferson have for the Louisiana Territory?
emmainna [20.7K]
- He sought a Northwestern route across the continent to the Pacific Ocean.

- He hoped to persuade Native American groups in the Lower Mississippi Valley to cede their lands in exchange for land in the Louisiana Territory.
3 0
1 year ago
what difficulties do you think might arise when trying to understand ideas from the past especially when those ideas are differe
forsale [732]

Answer:

Well, people will want to know why u are wanting the understand old ideas. Also, the older ideas are really conflicting with newer ideas.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Write a report analyzing the treaty agreement ending World War I
igomit [66]

Answer:

At the end of World War I, during a peace conference held in Paris, France, the victorious Allies concluded a series of peace treaties that would be imposed on the defeated Central Powers. The most important of these was the Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919 at the Palace of Versailles in Paris. The treaty, which codified peace terms between the Allies and Germany, held Germany responsible for starting the war, and imposed harsh penalties in terms of loss of territory, massive reparations payments and demilitarization.

Far from the “peace without victory” that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson had outlined in his famous Fourteen Points in early 1918, the Treaty of Versailles humiliated Germany while failing to resolve the underlying issues that had led to war in the first place. Economic distress and resentment of the treaty within Germany helped fuel the ultra-nationalist sentiment that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, as well as the coming of a second World War just two decades later.

From the Fourteen Points to the Paris Peace Conference  

In a speech to Congress in January 1918, Wilson laid out his idealistic vision for the post-war world. In addition to specific territorial settlements based on an Entente victory, Wilson’s so-called Fourteen Points emphasized the need for national self-determination for Europe’s different ethnic populations. Wilson also proposed the founding of a “general association of nations” that would mediate international disputes and foster cooperation between different nations in the hopes of preventing war on such a large scale in the future.

When German leaders signed the armistice ending hostilities in World War I on November 11, 1918, they believed this vision articulated by Wilson would form the basis for any future peace treaty. This would not prove to be the case.

The Paris Peace Conference opened on January 18, 1919, a date that was significant in that it marked the anniversary of the coronation of German Emperor Wilhelm I, which took place in the Palace of Versailles at the end of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Prussian victory in that conflict had resulted in Germany’s unification and its seizure of Alsace and Lorraine provinces from France. In 1919, France and its prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, had not forgotten the humiliating loss, and intended to avenge it in the new peace agreement.  

The Terms of the Versailles Treaty

The “Big Four” leaders of the victorious Western nations—Wilson of the United States, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Clemenceau of France and, to a lesser extent, Vittorio Orlando of Italy—dominated the peace negotiations in Paris. Germany and the other defeated powers, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey, were not represented at the conference; nor was Russia, which had fought as one of the Allied powers until 1917, when the country’s new Bolshevik government concluded a separate peace with Germany and withdrew from the conflict.

The Big Four themselves had competing objectives in Paris: Clemenceau’s main goal was to protect France from yet another attack by Germany, he sought heavy reparations from Germany as a way of limiting German economic recovery after the war and minimizing this possibility. Lloyd George, on the other hand, saw the rebuilding of Germany as a priority in order to reestablish the nation as a strong trading partner for Great Britain. For his part, Orlando wanted to expand Italy’s influence and shape it into a major power that could hold its own alongside the other great nations. Wilson opposed Italian territorial demands, as well as previously existing arrangements regarding territory between the other Allies; instead, he wanted to create a new world order along the lines of the Fourteen Points. The other leaders saw Wilson as too naive and idealistic, and his principles were difficult to translate into policy.

In the end, the European Allies imposed harsh peace terms on Germany, forcing the nation to surrender around 10 percent of its territory and all of its overseas possessions. The treaty also called for the demilitarization and occupation of the Rhineland, limited Germany’s army and navy, forbade it to maintain an air force, and required it to conduct war crimes trials against Kaiser Wilhelm II and other leaders for their aggression. Most importantly, Article 231 of the treaty, better known as the “war guilt clause,” forced Germany to accept full responsibility for starting World War I and pay enormous reparations for Allied war losses.

7 0
3 years ago
IS this correct ? 2
Dovator [93]

Answer:

I belive that is correct

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the 18th amendment adopted?
    6·1 answer
  • The constitutional convention of 1787 came close to
    14·1 answer
  • The winner of the presidential election in 1800 was
    16·2 answers
  • In the past century, governments have become more involved in regulating how land is used in our country. What has happened to c
    14·1 answer
  • Which answer choice lists the events of World War II in correct chronological order?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP MEEE! Which of these are effective research questions? Check all that apply. How did people respond to the different
    13·2 answers
  • When did the Civil War started
    7·2 answers
  • Does anyone know what the solid orange line represents?
    12·1 answer
  • Identify three ways boundaries are created and provide a specific example of each one.
    13·1 answer
  • “I don’t need the government to tell me what to do. I have enough respect for the people and world around me to make the right d
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!