This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company.
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493.
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
The paragraph 5 that reveal about Cesar Chavez was He believes that money and things imprison you. Thus option (D) is correct.
<h3>
Who was Cesar Chavez?</h3>
Cesar Chavez was a civil rights and labor activist in the United States who dedicated his life for the rights of the workers and the labors.
He initiated the the fight waged by American agricultural laborers to organize and negotiate fair contracts with their employers in order to improve their living and working conditions.
He also believed that money and things imprison you. In the earlier stages of his life he was also the labor working in the factory. thus he knows the conditions of the labors. Thus option (D) is correct.
Learn more about Cesar Chavez here:
brainly.com/question/18369390
#SPJ1
<h3>
Answer: D) contentedly </h3>
"contentedly" is basically another way of saying "happily"
This word modifies the verb "lives". It describes in more detail how the animal lives, rather than just simply saying "the elephant lives"
elephant = noun
endangered = adjective, since it describes the noun (elephant)
Which sentence uses an objective case pronoun as an indirect object?
I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.
The indirect object him identifies to whom the action of the verb <u>sent</u> is performed.
<em>Wrong options:</em>
I e-mailed him yesterday.
(The direct object <em>him</em> is the receiver of action within this sentence: I emailed him).
He wrote back to Bob and I with an answer to our questions.
(I is not an objective case pronoun; it should be "He wrote back to Bob and <u>me</u>...")
So, once again, the answer is the 2nd sentence (I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.)
