New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In 1911, after William Taft had fired the head of the United States Service, Gifford Pinchot, over accusations of business interests.
Theodore Roosevelt, former United States President who shared Pinchot's views regarding the importance of conservation, grew frustrated over Pinchot's dismissal and Taft's brand of conservatism.
He then later tried to recontest for the 1912 Republican nomination for president, which he failed, and went ahead to launch an independent campaign for president as head of the new Progressive Party
new kinda of food and clothing became possible.
