Hello, hopefully this helps you!
The Great Compromise solved issues between states with small populations and states with large populations.
The Great Compromise was developed at the Constitutional Convention and helped in creating the modern day structure of Congress. In this deal, both states with small populations and large populations got something they wanted. For example, the Senate would be composed of 2 Senators from each state, regardless of their states population. This helped to ensure that smaller states had a voice in the creation of federal laws.
On the other hand, the House of Representatives would have the number of representatives based on a states population. The greater the population, the more representatives. This made larger states happy, as they felt this accurately represented the power they should have in Congress.
Mark me as brainliest plz
Answer: Socialism refers to an economic and political system in which all factors of production are owned and controlled by the people.
Explanation: Socialism is based on economic and political theories that believes that production and distribution of goods and services are the sole responsibility of the people. The proponents of this theory does not believe in privately owned property, it should be owned by the community.
Communism is different from democratic socialism because communism in achieving their classless society idea through revolution, while democratic socialism has more flexible and subtle idea.
Secondly, Communism gives zero tolerance to private property. All properties are collectively owned and each person is allocated to, according to their needs while democratic socialism still give individual rights to own property.
Answer:
I bet it's children should be filial to their parents because they were big on children obeying parents espicially in ancient china
The Germanic tribes that took over the Roman Empire territory in the west had a history as tribal and hunting/agricultural societies. Even in times when it was fracturing in many ways, the Roman Empire was built around central organization and governance. The Germanic tribes had been more loyal to their own tribal groups than they were confederated into a unity with one another. Their historical patterns of development also had been more built around hunting and farming. They were not as developed in coordinating government over a massive stretch of territory. The Germans had begun learning things from the Romans during the years when many of them served as mercenaries in Roman armies. And they would learn more about building a far-reaching system of government. They were not ignorant "barbarians" when they took over Roman territory, but they weren't united in a plan to govern the region as a unit the way Rome had.
For comparison, you might think of the difference between the Native American nations that existed in North America when settlers from Europe came and took over their territory. In that case, the situation was reversed. The native tribal nations were used to operating independently as their own tribal nations, and were focused largely on hunting and agriculture. The white settlers were aiming at building a society more similar to how Rome had operated.
