The narrator more than likely used italics when writing the word "must" to provide emphasis. With the italics, the sentence can be read as if the character just had an experience that they cannot explain or describe in a way that makes sense in reality, and therefore convinces themselves that whatever just happened <em>must</em> have been a dream (On a side note, this is a common way for someone to react to a traumatic experience, or things that seem impossible. It is simply the brain coping with information that seems incomprehensible).<span />
Anybody capable of solving the problems can come up with them in a jiffy.
Answer:
I really think that is depends on how credible the citizen journalists are. What I mean by that is that we see a lot of pictures and videos on the news and online that are from people who are not journalists and it can behard to tell if videos or pictures are real. So I would say that it depends on the credibility of the source as well as where the vidoe or picture came from. There are many pros and cons of adding photos and videos taken by regular citizens to the news cycle. Some pros are citizens capture raw footage of events, they are able to capture events first hand, and they are able to footage of an event that most journalists aren’t (i.e. the beginning of the event, sometimes the event itself depending on what is happening, etc.). Some cons are that it takes jobs away from people who are trained journalists, the footage captured by citizens may have a better (has more information) picture or video of the event than the footage captured by real
Explanation:
