Answer:
1. Inside the dorm room, the movies are <em>Non-Rival</em> which means that one person can watch the movie and it will not diminish the ability of others to watch as well.
Also as they are all in the same dorm, the showing of the movie is <em>Non-Excludable</em> as well because no one can stop the other from watching.
Public good is both Non-Rival and Non-Excludable so the showing of a movie IS a public good.
2.
Musashi Sean Bob Eric Total Willingness to pay
10 9 8 3 30
8 7 6 2 23
6 5 4 1 16
4 3 2 0 9
2 1 0 0 3
The optimal number of movies that can be rented is dependent on their total willingness to pay. If their Total willingness to pay for the movie is above $8 which is the cost of a movie, then they will get it. From the table, the fifth movie is below the price of $8 so they <u>should rent 4 movie</u>s.
3. If they rent 4 movies and there are 4 of them then the cost per person is;
= (8 *4)/4 people
= 24/4
= $8
This means that each roommate will pay <u>$8</u>.
Answer:
Effectiveness
Explanation:
Organizational effectiveness shows the extent to which resources have been efficiently managed to produce intended results.
Efficiency has to do with maximal uses of resources available (i.e input versus output) while effectiveness show whether desirable outcomes have been achieved i.e whether organizational objectives are being achieved.
Answer:
The answer is true
Explanation:
The video streaming industry is vastly different from the DVD-by-mail rental industry. Curiously enough, one company has navigated both industries succesfully: Netflix was born as a DVD-by-mail service, and now is one of the most well-known streaming services.
Answer:
If closed the operating income will decrease by 50,000
Is a better scenario to continue with the residential sercives
Explanation:
<em><u>current scenario:</u></em>
contribution margin 450,000
Fixed Cost 480,000
net loss 30,000
<em><u>drop scenario:</u></em>
contribution margin = 0
fixed cost 450,000-370,000 = 80,000
net loss (80,000)
Answer:
A) Somewhat effective, but only to the extent that most of the tax cut is concurrently spent on domestic output, that multiplier effects occur, and crowding out is small.
Explanation:
First of all, the larger amount of money would increase the inflation rate since aggregate supply hasn't increased. The number of goods and services offered do not vary, then only thing that varies is the amount of disposable money.
The larger the multiplier, the larger the positive effect. The multiplier formula = 1 / MPS (marginal propensity to save). Even though inflation increases, still the economy is going to grow. That unless the local residents decide to purchase many imported goods. The larger the amount of imported goods purchased, the lower the positive effects.
This type of policy can be very effective under conditions where deflation or inflation rates are near 0 or even negative. Although high inflation is very bad for the economy, a small amount of inflation is always needed to boost economic growth. The healthy inflation is around 1.5 - 2% per year. This way salaries and wages can grow, pushing aggregate demand and supply.
