Answer:
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is 4X+2Y ≤ 100
Explanation:
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is shown below:
Given that
The number of hours taken per unit of x is 4 hours
And the number of hours taken per unit of x is 2 hours
And, the maximum hours available is 100
Now based on the above information
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is
= 4X+2Y ≤ 100
hence, the same is to be considered
Answer:
C. Country A equals –$100 million.
Explanation:
Imports from Country B to Country A = $200 million
Imports from Country A to Country B = $100 million
Imports for one country represents exports to another.
Net exports is the difference between exports and import for a country.
Net exports for country A = $100 million - $200 million = - $100 million
Net exports for country B = $200 million - $100 million = $100 million
Right option is C. Country A equals –$100 million. Country's A export is less than it's import.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Psychological–learning.
Explanation:
Psychological learning refers to the behavior individuals acquire based on their experiences, negative or positive. It is believed events of individuals' childhood shape their personalities in the future and their attitudes in front of different situations. The school of study in charge of studying behavior is called Behaviorism.
Answer:
C. A fixed stream of income or a stream of income that is determined according to a specified formula for the life of the security
Explanation:
A fixed income security is a type of investment that provides returns in form of regular, or fixed, interest payments and repayments of the principals when the security reaches maturity.
From the explanation above, the best possible answer is C. A fixed stream of income or a stream of income that is determined according to a specified formula for the life of the security
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.