1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlada-n [284]
3 years ago
12

How did Gandhi try to stop the fighting between different religious groups within India?

History
1 answer:
Andrews [41]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Independence for India and Pakistan </u>

 

In 1945, Muslims were about 25 percent of India's population. They were scattered across the sub-continent and were a majority of the population in India's Bengal and Punjab regions. India was a land of peoples of different ethnicity and fourteen official languages, with different dialects. The Muslims also varied in language and ethnicity, and they differed in economic class – from a wealthy few to merchants and urban and rural poor.

Muslims mixed little with Hindus, even if they were neighbors. Muslims were strict monotheists. They saw Hindus as idolators. Muslims had their Koran, and the Hindus had their ancient Bhagavad Gita. They did not study or eat together. They ate different foods, Muslims eating the meat of the cow, and Hindus worshipping cows. Muslims and Hindus did not intermarry. On trains, Muslim passengers drank "Muslim water" and Hindu passengers drank "Hindu water."

With India on its way to independence from British rule and on its way to establishing a constitution, many Muslims were afraid that Hindus would use their majority status to impose upon them laws that would deny them the freedom to pursue their way of life untainted by Hindu ways.

In the 1930s the leader of India's Congress Party, Jawaharlal Nehru, had wanted Muslims to join his party. The Congress Party won the elections that took place at the end of 1945. Nehru considered his party as representing the interests of Hindus and Muslims. but there was the Muslim League, which considered itself as representing Muslims. The Muslim League won all Muslim constituencies and 30 of the 102 seats in parliament.

The Muslim League leader was Muhammad Ali Jinnah. He had secularist leanings. He was a sophisticated man who disliked the kind of Hindu and Muslim small-mindedness that produced interfaith hostilities. Jinnah was an exceptionally shrewd and bright lawyer, a man who pressed hard for his goals, with the kind of skill in maneuver that Woodrow Wilson lacked at Paris.

In 1946, the British tried to facilitate an agreement between the Congress Party and the Muslim League – a basic plan preliminary to the creation of a constitution. There were those who believed that what the world needed was more integration rather than segregation. A greater integration was coming in Europe with a treaty for a European Economic Community, the forerunner of the European Union. And integration rather than segregation was to become a big issue in the United States. But it was segregation that was about to be adopted on the Indian sub-continent. Muslims wanted power divided by geography and by religious affiliation.

How to give sovereignty to Muslims living in communities scattered across the sub-continent was a problem, and in the Punjab, where the Muslims were a majority, there was the problem of Hindu minorities. Muslims, moreover, wanted a place for themselves called pak-i-stan, pak meaning purity, stan meaning place. In rallying Muslim support for his political party, Muhammad Ali Jinnah claimed that Muslims could not progress in their various spheres of life without pakistan. It was impossible, he claimed, "to live under Congress authority on account of acts of injustices." Muslims, he warned, would be "reduced to the status of Shudras [low castes]." He added that he would "never allow Muslims to be slaves of Hindus." Jinnah said that he wanted the Muslims of India to develop to the fullest of  "our spiritual, cultural and economic life in consonance with our own ideals, and according to the genius of our own people."

You might be interested in
were parcels of land on which native americans lived after they sold lor lost much of their land to the federal government. they
Igoryamba

The Dawes Act of 1887 authorized the federal government to break up tribal lands by partitioning them into individual plots. Only those Native Americans who accepted the individual allotments were allowed to become US citizens.

<h3>What is Dawes Act?</h3>

On tribal lands within the United States, the Dawes Act of 1887 governed land rights. Its authority, which bears Senator Henry L. Dawes's name from Massachusetts, allows the President of the United States to divide communal Native American tribal landholdings into allotments for Native American family and individual heads of household.

By making Native Americans "assume a capitalist and proprietary connection with property" that did not previously exist in their cultures, this would change the traditional systems of land tenure into a system of private property that is imposed by the government. The law gave tribes the choice to sell the federal government any unclaimed lands. Before allotments of private property could be made, the government had to determine "which Indians were eligible," which prompted a "official hunt.

To learn more about Dawes Act from the given link:

brainly.com/question/1751203

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
What is the growing concern regarding social security??
12345 [234]
That it's not gonna be around any longer
4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME!!!
VLD [36.1K]
South of the Sahara is a semi arid strip of land called the Sahel
4 0
3 years ago
Africans who fought with the British during World War I had hoped to be free from European control once the Allies were victorio
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Egypt.

Explanation:

Also, don't get it confused with the Middle East. The Middle East is Asian, and is all the countries East of Egypt in the Arab world.

5 0
3 years ago
What are some reasons for the start of world war 2
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

The major causes of World War II were numerous. They include the impact of the Treaty of Versailles following WWI, the worldwide economic depression, failure of appeasement, the rise of militarism in Germany and Japan, and the failure of the League of Nations.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When did the greeks begin to view outsiders as "barbarians"?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the the first presidents name
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following three battles or sites were important in the Revolutionary War?. A.Fort Detroit. B.Delaware River. C.New
    14·2 answers
  • How did the Virginia Plan improve the federal government established by the Articles of Confederation?
    5·1 answer
  • NEED HELPP NOWW FAST RIGHT AMSWERS!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • What was true of most prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups?
    6·2 answers
  • Answer Q1-4<br><br>Need this done ASAP!! <br>Please help! ​
    12·1 answer
  • Susie has just moved from the countryside into town. She brings with her, Toby, her pet sheep. She stopped one day as she and To
    14·1 answer
  • What city was the first capital of the United States?
    6·2 answers
  • List down at least 10 reasons that separates Human being from other animals.​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!