Your answer is going to be A
Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
Option 1. F F → T is the answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question the given conditional statements are
3×2 = 5 then 6 < 0
We have to find the truth value of these conditional statements.
Since multiplication of 3×2 = 6 therefore the truth value of this statement is False.
For the statement 6<0 truth value is false because 6 is always greater than 0.
Now we know in two statements P → Q, if they follow the Implication rule then truth value is False only when P is true and Q is false otherwise in every condition the truth value is True.
Therefore F F → T illustrates the statements of the question.
First we find the slope between the two given points.
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) = (-5 - 2)/(7 - 6) = -7/1 = -7
Now we use the slope-intercept equation of a line.
y = mx + b
We use one point as x and y, and we solve for b.
2 = -7(6) + b
2 = -42 + b
b = 44
The equation is
y = -7x + 44
Answer: f(x) = -7x + 44
Answer:
(x-1)!
Step-by-step explanation:
lets say you want to sit x people around a table you would do x!. but since it doesn't count if you rotate the table you have to divide it by x, so the answer is x!/x = (x-1)!
