1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
11

Segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH. Noah wrote a proof to show that triangle HEG is congruent to triangle FEG. Noah's

proof is not correct. Which line of Noah's proof is incorrect, and why1. Side EG is congruent to side EG because they're the same segment.
2. Angle EGH is congruent to angle EGF because segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH.

3. Angle HEG is congruent to angle FEG because segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH.

4. By the Angle-Side-Angle Triangle Congruence Theorem, triangle HEG is congruent to triangle FEG.


Line 2 is incorrect; there is not enough information given to state this.
Line 2 is incorrect; there is not enough information given to state this.

Line 2 is incorrect; even though segment EG is a bisector, angles EGH and FGH are not necessarily congruent.
Line 2 is incorrect; even though segment , EG, is a bisector, angles , EGH, and , FGH , are not necessarily congruent.

Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of , HG, , , FG, , , HE, , and , EF, , so this line is not valid based on the given information.

Line 4 is incorrect; Angle-Side-Angle is not a valid congruence theorem.
Line 4 is incorrect; Angle-Side-Angle is not a valid congruence theorem.
Mathematics
1 answer:
tangare [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.

But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.

You might be interested in
in 2010, the price of a laser printer was $1599. in 2018, the price of the same type of printer had dropped to $579. find the pe
uysha [10]

Hi there!

nearest percentage=64%

<em><u>1.Subtract starting value and final value:</u></em>

<em><u /></em>1599-579=1020<em><u /></em>

<em><u>2.Divide it by the starting value:</u></em>

<em><u /></em>1020*1599= 0.6378986866791744840525328330206378986<em><u /></em>

<em><u>3.Multiply the term by 100:</u></em>

<em><u /></em>0.6378986866791744840525328330206378986<em><u>·</u></em>100= 63.78986866791744840525328330206378986<em><u /></em>

<em><u>4.Round the term:</u></em>

<em><u /></em>63.78986866791744840525328330206378986=64<em><u /></em>

Therefore, the decrease of the total 8 years was 64%.

<em><u /></em>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can I get 104 using 2,3,5,8
IrinaK [193]
8 x (5 x 2 + 3)= 8 x ( 15 + 3) = 8 x 13 = 104. 
Hope I helped!(:
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the approximate distance between the points (–5, 4) and (2, –8)?
Volgvan

Answer:

option d is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance Equation Solution:

d=radical(2−(−5))2+(−8−4)2

d=radical(7)2+(−12)2

d=radical49+144

d=radical 1–93

d=13.892444

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andre is running in an 80-meter hurdle race. There are 8 equally-spaced hurdles on the race track. The first hurdle is 12 meters
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer: 32 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What value would be placed in the space shown to create a perfect square trinomial?
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

9/4 (Answer 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Take half the coefficient of x and square that result:

(1/2)(-3) = -3/2

Squaring this, we get 9/4 (Answer 2)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • G(X)= 6X - 3<br> What is g-1 (9)
    6·1 answer
  • Please help with the percent part
    15·1 answer
  • To decide whether two triangles are similar is it enough to know that two pairs of corresponding angle measures in the triangle
    11·1 answer
  • Need help on this question
    11·1 answer
  • Bruce bought two books. One book cost $4.00 more than three times the other. Toghter, the two books cost him 72
    14·1 answer
  • 21 meters is the same as how many feet?
    5·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to ? A. B. C. D.
    14·2 answers
  • Read carefully pls ty
    12·2 answers
  • Nina babysits on weekends for extra money. The function f(t) is equal to how much money she earns after babysitting t hours. On
    15·2 answers
  • How to solve 5/6=v+2/7
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!