1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
2 years ago
11

Segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH. Noah wrote a proof to show that triangle HEG is congruent to triangle FEG. Noah's

proof is not correct. Which line of Noah's proof is incorrect, and why1. Side EG is congruent to side EG because they're the same segment.
2. Angle EGH is congruent to angle EGF because segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH.

3. Angle HEG is congruent to angle FEG because segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH.

4. By the Angle-Side-Angle Triangle Congruence Theorem, triangle HEG is congruent to triangle FEG.


Line 2 is incorrect; there is not enough information given to state this.
Line 2 is incorrect; there is not enough information given to state this.

Line 2 is incorrect; even though segment EG is a bisector, angles EGH and FGH are not necessarily congruent.
Line 2 is incorrect; even though segment , EG, is a bisector, angles , EGH, and , FGH , are not necessarily congruent.

Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of , HG, , , FG, , , HE, , and , EF, , so this line is not valid based on the given information.

Line 4 is incorrect; Angle-Side-Angle is not a valid congruence theorem.
Line 4 is incorrect; Angle-Side-Angle is not a valid congruence theorem.
Mathematics
1 answer:
tangare [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.

But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.

You might be interested in
Is this right? please help me
Dimas [21]

Answer: i would help but the picture is blank .

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Х<br> 6 - 5 = (-13)<br> What does x equal?
asambeis [7]

Answer:

x = -48

<em><u>hopefully i helped :)</u></em>

7 0
3 years ago
Reduce fraction 27/36 lowest term
MAXImum [283]
If it 36/27 the answer is 1.33333 but if is 27/376 the answer will be 0.7 or 3/4
8 0
2 years ago
One jar of crushed ginger costs $2. How<br> many jars can you buy for $4?
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

2 jars

Step-by-step explanation:

If one jar costs $2 and you have $4 then $2+$2=$4

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A Cell Phone company sells cellular phones and airtime in a State. At a recent meeting, the marketing manager states that the av
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the average age of the customers differs from 40 years.

The sample does not support the manager claim (the average age seems to differ from 40 years).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The manager claims that the average age of customers is 40 years. As this is an equality, we will test if the average age differs from 40. If the null hypothesis failed to be rejected, the claim of the manager is right.

Then, the claim is that the average age of the customers differs from 40 years.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu=40\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 40

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=50.

The sample mean is M=38.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=7.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{7}{\sqrt{50}}=0.99

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{38-40}{0.99}=\dfrac{-2}{0.99}=-2.02

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

df=n-1=50-1=49

This test is a two-tailed test, with 49 degrees of freedom and t=-2.02, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

P-value=2\cdot P(t

As the P-value (0.049) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is  significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the average age of the customers differs from 40 years.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the slope of the line shown?
    11·1 answer
  • In Kelly’s new clothing store, she charges $16.50 for each shirt she sells. What was Kelly’s revenue if she sold 39 shirts last
    5·2 answers
  • 7) Find the area (in cm).<br> h<br> 7 x 6 square
    11·1 answer
  • The Robinson family is having new carpet installed in the dining room the carpet cost $299 for insulation and $15 for each squar
    10·2 answers
  • Please help me with this question!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Determine the simple interest when: principal: $15,850 interest rate: 3.75%, time: 7 year
    7·1 answer
  • YOO help me this is so hard.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the solution to the equation
    6·1 answer
  • A bycycling club has 18 members,of which 11 are males and the rest females. What is the ratio of males to all club members
    5·1 answer
  • Kim purchased a dress that was originally $35. It was on sale for 30% off. She also bought a pair of shoes for 1/2 off the origi
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!