Answer:
srry if this is wrong
Explanation:
The treatment of slaves in the United States varied widely depending on conditions, time, and place. Generally speaking, urban slaves in the northernmost Southern states had better working conditions and more freedom than their counterparts on Deep South plantations. As slavery became more entrenched and slaves both more numerous and valuable, punishments for infractions increased.
Treatment was generally characterized by brutality, degradation, and inhumanity. Whippings, executions, and rapes were commonplace, and slaves were usually denied educational opportunities, such as learning how to read or write. Medical care was often provided to slaves by the slaveholder’s family or fellow slaves who had gleaned medical knowledge via ancestral folk remedies and/or experiences during their time in captivity. After well-known rebellions, such as that by Nat Turner in 1831, some states even prohibited slaves from holding religious gatherings due to the fear that such meetings would facilitate communication and possibly lead to insurrection or escape.
Isolated exceptions existed to the generally horrific institution of slavery. For instance, there were slaves who employed white workers, slave doctors who treated upper-class white patients, and slaves who rented out their labor. Yet these were far from common occurrences.
Answer:
The Intolerable Acts were aimed at isolating Boston, the seat of the most radical anti-British sentiment, from the other colonies. Colonists responded to the Intolerable Acts with a show of unity, convening the First Continental Congress to discuss and negotiate a unified approach to the British.
Explanation:
<em></em>
<em>yagurlemil107</em>
<em>hope this helps srry if it doesn't tho</em>
The Battles of Lexington and Concord signaled the start of the American Revolutionary war.
I think that they are still beefin over what the outcome was in the korean war when they were restricted to two countries and they arnt over it
Gorge Washington warned that political parties would lead to a dangerous division within the United States--which he believed would make the US vulnerable to disputes and foreign attacks. He ultimately thought that political parties would weaken the nation.