I think all of these are correct, Im not certain
One of the causes for America's 2009 economic crisis was the invention of subprime mortgages, for 'second class' clients, who previously did not have access to credits, but the innovation of securitizing these mortgages arose, clients paid only interest the first years, making the quotas lower, but the interest rates were variable and then they were increasing and the salaries were being eaten by those payments, the central bank allowed the rules of the game to be changed, because of the crisis that was coming, this left thousands of Americans unemployed and without homes. In all this the government did not intervene favorably, on the contrary, after a while it helped the financial system to recover, but no citizen could do it.
The cable act of 1992 gave the right to fair and effective cable. It also protected cable operators from going out of business.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Cable Act of 1992 gave buyers the option to reasonable and powerful cable. It additionally mirrored the administration's craving to shield link administrators from pushing communicate organizes out of the business and it shielded general society from foul substance.
Thus this act is clearly a fairness doctrine because it acted as fair for both the consumers also by giving them effective cable and operators of the cable also from going out of the business and giving them employment.
