What is the difference between smart and stretch goals??

1 answer:

8 0

Smart goal's are the achievable good goal like you want to plant then a high class gardener that pay's good is a smart goal so smart goal's are the goal you like but can do even if it doesn't pay the most, Stretch goal is a dream job that you have trained far and wide for that has been your profession that you want most that even if you can't get you want and are best at, So the difference is smart goal's are achievable and your good at so you could and should get that goal stretch goal's are the one you want most that you have trained for most but may or may not get.

You might be interested in

1.) How does justice relate to fairness and

mash [69]

<h2>Question_1. The most fundamental principle of justice—one that has been widely accepted since it was first defined by Aristotle more than two thousand years ago—is the principle that "equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally." In its contemporary form, this principle is sometimes expressed as follows: "Individuals should be treated the same, unless they differ in ways that are relevant to the situation in which they are involved." For example, if Jack and Jill both do the same work, and there are no relevant differences between them or the work they are doing, then in justice they should be paid the same wages. And if Jack is paid more than Jill simply because he is a man, or because he is white, then we have an injustice—a form of discrimination—because race and sex are not relevant to normal work situations.</h2>

<h2>Question-2. Social privilege</h2>

 Social privilege is a theory of special advantage or entitlement, used to one's own benefit or to the detriment of others. These groups can be advantaged based on social class, age, height, nationality, disability, ethnic or racial category, gender, gender identity, neurology, sexual orientation, and religion.It is generally considered to be a theoretical concept used in a variety of subjects and often linked to social inequality.Privilege is also linked to social and cultural forms of power.It began as an academic concept, but has since been invoked more widely, outside of academia.

<h2>Question-3. Racism has been—and unfortunately still is—such a prominent feature of so many human societies that it might be tempting to think of it as somehow "natural" or "innate."</h2><h2 /><h2>Racism has been—and unfortunately still is—such a prominent feature of so many human societies that it might be tempting to think of it as somehow "natural" or "innate."Indeed, this is the conclusion that some evolutionary psychologists have come to. Evolutionary psychology tries to account for present-day human traits in terms of the survival benefit they might have had to our ancestors. If a trait has survived and become prevalent, then the genes associated with it must have been "selected" by evolution.</h2>

<h2>Question_4. The Veil of Ignorance, a component of social contract theory, allows us to test ideas for fairness.</h2>

Like many thought experiments, the Veil of Ignorance could never be carried out in the literal sense, nor should it be. Its purpose is to explore ideas about justice, morality, equality, and social status in a structured manner.

<h2>Question-5. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, protects employees and job applicants from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.</h2>

<h2>Question-6. They’re surrounded by pieces of the puzzle, but can’t put them together</h2>

<h2>Question-7 The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" - that actions will have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor. For example, the assumptions that noble actions will eventually be rewarded and evil actions will eventually be punished fall under this hypothesis. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of— either a universal force that restores moral balance or a universal connection between the nature of actions and their results. This belief generally implies the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, and/or order. It is often associated with a variety of fundamental fallacies, especially in regard to rationalizing suffering on the grounds that the sufferers "deserve" it.</h2>

<h2>Question-8. In game theory terminology, interpersonal trust is associated with the 'type' of the other players (or his own disposition to believe other players), while the institutional trust is related to the rules of the game.</h2>

<h2>Hope this helps you ❤️</h2>

<h2>Mark me as brainliest ❤️</h2>

3 0

3 years ago

What is one role of the federal government’s department of justice? to eliminate all barriers to entry to break up monopolies to

Marianna [84]

The answer is to break up monopolies. One part of the government's justice department is to separate restraining infrastructures, in charge of the authorization of the law and organization of equity in the United States, proportionate to the equity or inside services of different nations.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Reports from dream studies indicate that most dreams are positive. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F

cluponka [151]

The correct answer is False.

Some dream content investigations have shown that dream experiences have a negative bias. What is difficult for the scientist to conclude is if the bias to the negative side has a real support o is a selective function of memory.

What is true is that every person dreams, people forget dreams, woman and man dream different things, and negative emotions are common to appear in dreams.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An overly general belief about what women and men are like is known as a gender

Lisa [10]

True
An overly general belief about what women and men are like is known as a gender

4 0

3 years ago

Mark is angry because his wife invited friends over when he wanted to relax. he decides to act bored during the entire evening.

cestrela7 [59]

Mark is angry because his wife invited friends over when he wanted to relax. he decides to act bored during the entire evening. Mark’s behavior reflects sabotage.

You might be surprised that most self-sabotage behavior stems from self-preservation. Sometimes we sabotage ourselves to escape unpleasant emotions. Perhaps we haven't been taught how to deal with or process difficult thoughts and emotions, so we do everything we can to keep them in check in the moment.

Behavior that interferes with long-term goals is considered self-destructive. The most common self-sabotaging behaviors include procrastination, self-medication with drugs and alcohol, comfort eating, and self-harming behaviors such as cutting.

Learn more about sabotage here:brainly.com/question/10010085

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago