Answer:
Lord Dunmore, the royal governor of Virginia, was determined to maintain British rule in the southern colonies and promised to free those enslaved men of rebel owners who fought for him.
Explanation:
Answer:
Elaborative rehearsal
Explanation:
Elaborative rehearsal: In psychology, the term elaborative rehearsal is defined as a phenomenon that is responsible for encoding particular information into an individual's long-term memory with the help of brain-processing that information in depth.
It helps an individual to make an association or connection between a piece of information that he or she is trying to learn and the formerly present information in his or her memory.
It encompasses deep semantic processing of a piece of information yet to be remembered that leads to the development of durable memories and it is considered as more effective as compared to maintenance rehearsal.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the importance of elaborative rehearsal.
Answer:
The line item veto Act of 1996
Explanation:
Answer:check explanation
Explanation:
When people BREAK UP they are likely to find it HARD OR DIFFICULT to let go of their partner because it hurts so much even for the person who wants out of the relationship.
After breakup, most people think that getting back together is the next and important thing to do. But in reality, keeping your partner (again) is the hardest part.
When people are still in love, they have great patience for their partner's faux pas, they quickly forgive and turn blind eye towards their partner's error, but when the love is already fading they find it hard to heal errors and they criticize mistakes.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
