Answer:
It could not impose taxes
Explanation:
The articles of confederation were weak and lacked an executive such as a president as well as they did not have the capability to tax citizens
Parties may suggest an en banc hearing to the judges but have no right to it. ... Each court of appeals also has particular rules regarding en banc proceedings.
So it could really go either way
The correct answer would be option C, It is void.
An unscrupulous investor completes a contract with a buyer to sell a property the investor does not own. This sales contract for the transaction is Void.
Explanation:
When something is not legally bounded, or there is no legal restrictions to carry that thing, then this would be considered void. An invalid, null or cancelled thing is called as void.
So according to the question, when a dishonest, and unfair person or investor makes a deal with the buyer to sell a property which he does not own, and goes into a contract with him, then the contract is void, because the person himself does not own the property he is going to sell. There will be no legal binding of this contract.
Learn more about Void Contract at:
brainly.com/question/9582675
#LearnWithBrainly
Bankruptcy is a legal rank of a person or other object
that cannot reimburse debts to creditors. In here the high rate means that it
is a legal process in which a court takes over approximately of the finances of
an individual who is incapable to recompense his or her bills.
