The Constitution more explicit in defining the functions of the other branches of government than it does regarding the responsibilities of Congress. Therefore, it's false.
<h3>What is Constitution?</h3>
It should be noted that the Constitution simply means the establishment of the laws and fundamental rights of the people on a country.
In this case, the constitution more explicit in defining the functions of the other branches of government than it does regarding the responsibilities of Congress. Therefore, it's false.
Learn more about Constitution on:
brainly.com/question/453546
There were major political differences between the Federalists and the Republicans during 1790 that led to the creation of political parties in the United States.
<h3>How were political parties in the US created?</h3>
During the 1790s, a great amount of imbalance was experienced in the American society. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had been under conflicts.
Their conflicts led to the creation of two different political parties in the US. Federalists and Republican Parties were created due to the political differences.
Hence, significance of US political parties is aforementioned.
Learn more US political parties here:
brainly.com/question/18725183
#SPJ4
Hello.
The answer is: the principle or practice or a program of public provision for the economic security and social welfare of the individual and his or her family; especially, capitalized both Ss : a U.S. government program established in 1935 to include old-age and survivors insurance, contributions to state unemployment insurance, and old-age assistance.
Have a nice day
Answer:
Between 1930 and 1945 the sociological profession suffered an identity crisis. Its origin and resolution were compounded of both academic realpolitik and theoretical dilemmas: generational conflicts and university power blocs on the one hand, and persisting intellectual obsessions on the other. Contemporary sociologists may find our current situation to be both derivative and parallel. <em>Hope this helps!</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
Relativism ostensibly allows anything to be morally right as long as <em><u>it is judged in relation to the culture, society or historical aspect associated with that area rather than another location</u></em>. For example, in a situation where one person eats earthworm, it is wrong to judge that person because your culture does not eat such. There is no absolute right when cultures of an area is factored in in deciding what is morally right.
Explanation:
