C) The bookshelves swayed with the weight of their load.
A dangling modifier is a description that seems to be connected to the wrong noun grammatically. Sometimes they are hard to spot since our brains make the connection for us, but if you read the sentence exactly as it is, you will notice it. Option A is wrong because the modifier is "feeling anxious", but we don't know who or what is feeling anxious. Our brains know that it is the person who is having to hold still, but there is no person in the sentence. Option B is not correct because the modifier "screaming" is close to the noun "raft" in the sentence. We know that a raft cannot scream therefore the modifier is not in the right place. Option D's modifier is "missing my family". In the sentence the modifier seems to be modifying dormitory, but this doesn't make sense since a dormitory doesn't have a family or the capability to miss one.
I would answer A Somatoform
those are real troubles doctors can't explain
hope I helped !
In "To Autumn," John Keat is using an accent, hence the "hath," "thee," "oft," and "thy." Susan Hartley Swett on the other hand isn't using a specific "accent." She is only describing July, not making any emphasis on an accent. In "To Autumn," John Keat is using an upbeat tone, vividly describing the reds and oranges or autumn, whereas in "July," Susan Hartley Swett is using a more mellow tone. As here, quoted from "July," 'Underneath petals pink till the night stars wink At the sunset in the sky, It's July.' Notice how soft her language is here. And quoted from "To Autumn," 'Steady thy laden head across a brook; Or by a cider-press, with patient look, Thou watchest the last oozings, hours by hours.' See his more upbeat description of this season, and his impatience as well (Thou watchest the last oozings, hours by hours). In comparison, though, both are vividly describing with extremely descriptive language and style. You can literally picture yourself in their scenarios, under the soft stars in warm July, or feeling the crispness of Autumn.
Please mark as brainiest :)
Explanation:
Senator James Inhofe replying indirectly to Leonardo DiCaprio's earlier statement in which he said: "I want the public to be very scared by what they see. I want them to see a very bleak future", responded with a harsh rhetoric saying: "..it is important to take note of our pop culture propaganda campaign aimed at children".
Remember, it all began in 2017 when Leonardo DiCaprio released a science based movie centered on climate change that presented terrifying facts about the future of the climate, which critics such as Senator Ihofe at the time called highly exaggerated.
Answer:
1. He believed education was important (thought)
2. He thought fathers ought to set an example (action)
3. I think there is something about bullies, but I don't remember the details of how he handled that. (action)
For #4 you could find something he said to the school board about what he believed. (speech)
Explanation:
no explanation needed i hope :)
