Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
What are the options? I cannot tell you the answer unless I can see the options.
Answer:
Federalism guarded against tyranny by first dividing between two distinct governments. The portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments... Federalism gave powers to the central government. They gave powers to the states, and they shared powers together.
Explanation:
hope it helps
All are non-living except molecule
hope this helps
eggs i guess can count as living, but thats after the baby is born, so non living
molecule also may be living, but it depends on the person
