In what ways was the leadership style of khrushchev different from that of Stalin’s?

History

1 answer:

Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

During what was known in the Soviet Union as the Great Patriotic War (Eastern Front of World War II), Khrushchev was again a commissar, serving as an intermediary between Stalin and his generals. Khrushchev was present at the bloody defense of Stalingrad, a fact he took great pride in throughout his life.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What is a tax on the production or sale of a good called? revenue tax subsidy income tax excise tax

riadik2000 [5.3K]

The answer would be excise tax

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The legend of Pocahantas at the Jamestown colony is just that;

castortr0y [4]

The answer is true.....

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was one result of the Thirty Year war

Lana71 [14]

One result of the war was the division of Germany into many territories — all of which, despite their membership in the Empire, won de facto sovereignty. This limited the power of the Holy Roman Empire and decentralized German power. TheThirty Years' War rearranged the European power structure.

4 0

3 years ago

How did the Compromise of 1850 address the question of slavery in Washington, D.C.?

valkas [14]

Answer:

As a result of the Compromise of 1850, slavery continued in Washington DC, but slave trading was banned.

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1850 was a set of legislative initiatives carried out in the United States in 1850 to resolve a series of tensions arising with the colonization of California, driven by the so-called gold fever, and by annexation of territories after the US intervention in Mexico (1846-1848), which gave rise to territorial conflicts and the discussion about the legality of slavery in the new states.

In addition to admitting California as a free state and Utah and New Mexico as slave states, the sale of slaves, though not slavery, was banned in Washington DC as part of the Compromise of 1850.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

There were three types of colonies. In the first, called a _______________________ colony, a __________________ was granted to a

sukhopar [10]

Answer:

There were three types of colonies. In the first, called a Self governing colony, a territory was granted to a group of people. They were able to vote and could choose their own government. The second, called a Royal colony, was governed directly or indirectly by the British Crown. In the last kind (called a Proprietary colony), a territory was granted to a proprietor or individual, who was entrusted to govern the colony

Explanation:

There were three types of colonies, Self governing, royal and proprietary.

King owned the royal colonies

Proprietary colonies were land grants from the British government. Individuals were given huge tracts of land in return for financial and political favors. they could govern and supervise the colonies. The colonial governors were directly answerable to the king. Delaware, Pennsylvania and Maryland were proprietary colonies.

Self governing colonies were formed by the charters given to joint stock colonies by the king. Such companies had their own government in the colonies that was independent of the crown. Rhode island and Connecticut were self governing colonies.

8 0

3 years ago