The correct answer is D) genuinely cared about the disadvantaged in society.
President Lyndon Johnson genuinely cared about the disadvantaged in society.
After President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, the vice president, Lyndon B, Johnson became the 36th President of the US. He really was interested in the difficult situation of many Americans. Economic problems, among others, had hit hard many citizens that were living in harsh conditions. That is why President Johnson created the "Great Society," a series of reforms to help the ones in need in the country.
Johnson wanted to diminish poverty in America, combat crime, and eliminate discrimination based on race. He supported important health legislation such as Medicare and also supported the Civil Rights Act.
Answer:
stereotyping
Explanation:
In social psychology, the term "stereotype" is referred to as a process that consists of an individual's over-generalized belief" related to a specific category of different individuals. The stereotype is considered as an exception that one person can have towards another person who belongs to a specific community or group. Therefore, the expectation can vary in terms of preferences, personality, capability, etc.
Stereotyping: The process of having a stereotypical behavior or personality towards the other person.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of stereotyping.
I believe the answer is: plasticity
Value of plasticity refers to the quality that obtained by a certain individual after performing a same task over and over again. This value is basically held by all living organisms, which buried deep in brain and most commonly recognized as survival instinct to adapt to the environment around us.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
The Coase Theorem also states that when conflicting property rights occur, bargaining between the parties involved will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of which party is ultimately awarded the property rights, as long as the transaction costs associated with bargaining are negligible. If trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights.
Fish first then Apes then Humans
