1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
4 years ago
11

Does the power of judicial review necessarily lead to judicial supremacy? ;)

Social Studies
2 answers:
zlopas [31]4 years ago
6 0
<span>Judicial review does not lead to judicial supremacy because it is an example of the separation of powers. It allows each of the branches of government to maintain power, without supreme power going to any individual branch.</span>
pashok25 [27]4 years ago
3 0

Judicial review does not lead to judicial supremacy because it is an example of the separation of powers.


A government obtain judicial supremacy if the government could make any legislation without any chance of being apprehended.

Judicial review provide the ability to apprehend the government if they blatantly do something that violate the constitution.

You might be interested in
Why did Jefferson want to avoid alliances with other countries
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer: Jefferson Wanted thiongs to be peaceful he didnt want to side with france because they might need tea or other things from Britian

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
People look to government for which of the following reasons?
irina [24]
I’m not exactly sure but i would say letter C. A governments main purpose is to help establish rules and control so order is maintained. without a government, everything would turn into chaos.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will the right to the child help in the development of the children? With example.
irina [24]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

becuse it will help then try new things

4 0
3 years ago
What statement is true of an executive agreement?
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

They enhance the presidential power in foreign affairs

Explanation:

An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of the governments of different nations. President of the United States makes this agreement. These agreements are often used to avoid the requirements of the national constitutions for ratification of treaties.

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone help (I NEED TO GET 100% ON THIS EXAM)
lesya [120]

Answer:

Im not 100% sure im correct but i think it is C.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How would the Proclamation of 1763 conflict with the concept of Natural Right?
    11·1 answer
  • Edward starts to worry about telling his therapist about his drinking. He is afraid that the therapist will get mad at him like
    6·1 answer
  • Siv tends to view herself as distinct and unique from others, and she values personal achievement, self-direction, and competiti
    5·1 answer
  • Instant death was usually reserved for member of the poorer classes and not the nobility. true false
    10·1 answer
  • How does the division of purusha's body give justification for the social status of the castes in india?
    10·1 answer
  • Ten years after Brown v. Board of Education (1954), only ________ percent of black children in the Deep South attended school wi
    7·1 answer
  • (SOCIOLOGY QUESTION) A discovery only brings extensive change when: a) it is well publicized in the society. b) people adapt to
    15·1 answer
  • Look at a political cartoon from the 1830s. This cartoon mocked President Andrew Jackson for blocking the renewal of the Second
    5·2 answers
  • What a is a trade-off?
    12·1 answer
  • A soccer goalkeeper is facing a penalty shot. Hick's law predicts that the goalkeeper's RT will be high due to the various numbe
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!