Well, structurally it would be similar with the Pope being the head of the Church, like a King. Then respectively you have the archbishop who rules an ecclesiastical province. Then the bishops rule the diocese that make up the province. In that way, the line of power is similar with King, nobles and peasants.
Answer:
The freedom of Religion supports all religions and you can follow a religion of your choosing or not floowing a religion at all.
Hope it helps :)
The constitution convention was held so as to be able to discuss about how to govern America.
<h3>What is
constitution convention?</h3>
The Constitutional Convention was organized to come into conclusion about the governing of America.
This convention took place on May 1787, and it took place in Pennsylvania and revision of the existing Articles of Confederation was done.
Learn more about constitution convention at:
brainly.com/question/14018105
#SPJ1
The ruling determined that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.
In doing so, the Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
