All categories

2 years ago

Find measure of side AB round to nearest tenth

Mathematics

1 answer:

vova2212 [387]2 years ago

8 0

Use:

$|AB|^2=|AC|^2+|BC|^2-2|AC||BC|\cos(m\angle ACB)$

We have:

$|AC|=13;\ |BC|=29;\ m\angle ACB=41^o$

$\cos41^o\approx0.7547$

substitute:

$|AB|^2=13^2+29^6-2\cdot13\cdot29\cdot0.7547\\\\|AB|^2=440.9562\\\\|AB|\approx21$

You might be interested in

Two line are ___ if and only if they lie in the same plane and do not intersect, and two lines are __ if and only if they lie in

Vilka [71]

the answer is C, I think because parallel lines never touch

6 0

2 years ago

nia cuts hair. she finished 6 haircuts in the 4 hours before lunch. how many hours must she work to finish 24 haircut

Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4x6=24

6 0

2 years ago

if y=x + 5 were changed to y= x+ 9 how would the graph of the new function compare with the first one

WITCHER [35]

It would shift up, that is the anwser

7 0

2 years ago

find the coordinates of p so that p partitions segment ab in the part to whole ratio of 1 to 4 with a(-5,4) and b(7,-4)

scoray [572]

Answer:

$p(x,y) = (-2.6 ,2.4)$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

a(-5,4) and b(7,-4)

Required

Partition P

Given that the segment ab is divided into ratio;

The coordinates of point p can be calculated using ratio formula given below

$p(x,y) = (\frac{mx_2 + nx_1}{m+n} ,\frac{my_2 + ny_1}{m+n})$

Where m and n are the ratio; m = 1 and n = 4

$(x_1, y_1) = (-5,4); \\(x_2, y_2) = (7,-4)$

So,

$p(x,y) = (\frac{mx_2 + nx_1}{m+n} ,\frac{my_2 + ny_1}{m+n})$ becomes

$p(x,y) = (\frac{1 *7 + 4 * -5}{1+4} ,\frac{1 * -4 + 4 * 4}{1+4})$

$p(x,y) = (\frac{7 + -20}{5} ,\frac{-4 + 16}{5})$

$p(x,y) = (\frac{-13}{5} ,\frac{12}{5})$

$p(x,y) = (-2.6 ,2.4)$

Hence, the coordinates of p are (-2.6,2.4)

3 0

3 years ago

Can y’all help me pls

krok68 [10]

Answer:

2. The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. The expected height for someone with a femur length of 65 centimeters.

Doesn't make sense, that would be height value when centimeters = 65.

2. The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.

Makes sense, for every increase in one additional centimeter, we can expect the height to be proportional to the slope.

3. The femur length for someone with an expected height of 2.5 centimeters.

Doesn't make sense, the linear relationship relies on the femur length to get the height.

4. The change in expected femur length for every one additional centimeter of height.

Doesn't make sense, again, the linear relationship relies on the femur length.

6 0

1 year ago